Journal

The 90-Day Question: How Long Should You Give a Supplement?

Journal

The 90-Day Question: How Long Should You Give a Supplement?

You've bought a supplement. You've taken it for five days. You don't feel anything dramatic. So the question starts forming: is this working, or am I wasting my money? It's a fair question. And it's the reason most men abandon supplements before they've had a chance to do anything. They expect pharmaceutical speed from botanical ingredients, and when the bottle doesn't deliver overnight results, they write it off and move on to the next one. But the timeline question isn't just about patience. It's about understanding how botanical formulas actually work in the body, why that process is fundamentally different from how medication works, and what a realistic expectation arc looks like. Pharmaceuticals vs botanicals: different mechanisms, different timelines When a man takes sildenafil (Viagra), the drug inhibits a specific enzyme (PDE5), increases nitric oxide availability, relaxes smooth muscle, and improves blood flow to the penis. This happens within 30 to 60 minutes. The mechanism is direct, targeted, and fast. That's what pharmaceuticals are designed to do. Botanical supplements work differently. They don't override a biological process with a targeted chemical intervention. They support existing biological systems through multiple, often interconnected pathways. The effects are typically cumulative rather than immediate. A review published in Frontiers in Pharmacology, examining the clinical benefits of herbal medicines across multiple conditions, found that study durations for botanicals were predominantly between 4 and 12 weeks, with some extending to 6 months. The researchers noted that herbal medicines work through gradual physiological modulation rather than acute pharmacological intervention. [1] This isn't a weakness of botanical formulas. It's a fundamental characteristic of how they work. They support systems rather than override them, which means the body needs time to respond, adapt, and produce measurable changes. What the research shows about specific timelines The clinical studies on individual ingredients commonly found in men's health formulas give us a reasonable picture of what to expect and when. Tongkat Ali: The 2013 study by Talbott et al. measured outcomes at 4 weeks. It found a 37% increase in salivary testosterone and a 16% reduction in cortisol after 28 days of daily supplementation at 200mg. Mood improvements (reduced tension, anger, and confusion) were also measured at the 4-week mark. [2] The longer 2021 trial by Leitão et al. ran for 6 months and found that the most significant improvements in erectile function and testosterone levels appeared in the later stages of the trial, particularly in the group combining supplementation with exercise. [3] Maca Root: Studies on maca typically run for 8 to 12 weeks before measuring sexual desire outcomes. A 2002 study published in Andrologia found that improvements in sexual desire were noticeable at 8 weeks of supplementation. [4] Zinc: For men who are genuinely deficient, zinc supplementation can begin to improve testosterone levels within 4 to 6 weeks. But if zinc levels are already adequate, supplementation maintains rather than elevates. [5] The pattern across the research is consistent. The first noticeable changes tend to appear around weeks 2 to 4 (energy, mood, stress response). The more complex outcomes, including hormonal balance, sexual function, and sustained drive, typically require 6 to 12 weeks of consistent daily use. Why most men quit too early The supplement industry has created a paradox. Brands make aggressive promises that set the expectation for rapid results. When those rapid results don't materialise, the buyer assumes the product doesn't work and stops taking it, often within the first two to three weeks. But the research consistently shows that 2 to 3 weeks is too short for most botanical ingredients to produce their full effects. The man who quits at day 14 isn't evaluating the formula. He's evaluating his expectations. This is compounded by the fact that the earliest changes are often subtle. A slight lift in energy. A marginally better mood. Feeling a bit more present during the day. These changes don't announce themselves with a fanfare. They accumulate quietly, and many men don't notice them until someone else points out the difference, or until they stop taking the supplement and notice the baseline dropping back. The 90-day framework Based on the available research and the timeline patterns across multiple botanical ingredients, a reasonable framework for evaluating a men's daily supplement looks like this: Weeks 1 to 2: Baseline adjustment. Your body is absorbing and beginning to process the ingredients. Some men notice subtle shifts in energy or mood during this phase. Others don't notice anything yet. Neither response means the formula is or isn't working. It means the process has started. Weeks 3 to 4: First noticeable changes. This is typically when men report the first clear differences. Energy that lasts further into the day. Mood that feels more stable. A sharpness or initiative that had been absent. The cortisol and stress-response data from the Tongkat Ali research aligns with this window. Weeks 6 to 8: Deeper effects emerge. Hormonal support, blood flow improvements, and sexual function tend to build during this phase. The body has had time to adjust to the daily input, and the cumulative effects of the formula become more apparent. This is also when the compounding effect starts, where energy, mood, drive, and desire begin reinforcing each other rather than operating as separate benefits. Weeks 8 to 12: Full assessment window. By 12 weeks, the formula has had sufficient time to deliver across all the systems it's designed to support. This is the point at which you can make a genuine, informed judgement about whether the supplement is making a meaningful difference to how you feel and perform daily. Why the 3-month supply makes sense This timeline is the reason many serious supplement brands, including Talon, anchor their pricing around a 3-month supply. It's not a commitment trap. It's a dosing strategy that aligns with how botanical ingredients actually work. A 30-day supply gives you enough time to notice the earliest changes but not enough to experience the fuller effects. If you judge the formula at day 30, you're evaluating it partway through its arc. A 90-day supply gives the formula the full window the research supports. It's also why a money-back guarantee on the 3-month supply matters. It removes the financial risk from the equation and lets the buyer evaluate the product on the right timeline, without feeling pressured to decide before the formula has done its work. How to evaluate properly If you're taking a daily men's formula and want to know whether it's genuinely working, here's a practical approach: Don't judge it in the first week. The first 7 days are absorption and adjustment. Expecting noticeable changes this early is setting yourself up for disappointment. Pay attention to the subtle shifts. The first changes are often energy, mood, and mental clarity. They're easy to miss if you're only looking for dramatic bedroom improvements. Keep a simple log. Rate your energy, mood, and drive on a 1 to 10 scale each morning. After 4 weeks, look at the trend rather than any individual day. This removes the bias of trying to "feel" something in the moment. Give it the full 90 days before deciding. If the formula is going to work for you, 90 days is enough time for the full picture to emerge. If it hasn't made a noticeable difference by then, it's fair to conclude it's not the right fit. Don't stack it with five other things. If you're taking a multi-ingredient formula alongside three other supplements, a new exercise routine, and a diet change, you won't be able to attribute any changes to any specific input. Simplify. Take the formula consistently. Change one thing at a time. References [1] Kelber O, Steinhoff B, Nauert C, Saller R, Abdel-Aziz H, Heinle H. Current state of research on the clinical benefits of herbal medicines for non-life-threatening ailments. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2023;14:1234701. PMID: 37841934. [2] Talbott SM, Talbott JA, George A, Pugh M. Effect of Tongkat Ali on stress hormones and psychological mood state in moderately stressed subjects. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2013;10:28. PMC3669033. [3] Leitão AE, de Souza Vieira MC, Pelegrini A, da Silva EL, de Azevedo Guimarães AC. A 6-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to evaluate the effect of Eurycoma longifolia (Tongkat Ali) and concurrent training on erectile function and testosterone levels in androgen deficiency of aging males (ADAM). Maturitas. 2021;145:78-85. PMID: 33541567. [4] Gonzales GF, Córdova A, Vega K, Chung A, Villena A, Góñez C, Castillo S. Effect of Lepidium meyenii (MACA) on sexual desire and its absent relationship with serum testosterone levels in adult healthy men. Andrologia. 2002;34(6):367-372. PMID: 12472620. [5] Prasad AS, Mantzoros CS, Beck FW, Hess JW, Brewer GJ. Zinc status and serum testosterone levels of healthy adults. Nutrition. 1996;12(5):344-348. PMID: 8875519. Talon's 3-month supply is built around this timeline. 90 days of consistent daily use. If you don't feel the difference by then, you get every penny back. That's not a marketing claim. It's a product guarantee designed around how botanical formulas actually work.
What Men Get Wrong About Erectile Dysfunction After 35

Journal

What Men Get Wrong About Erectile Dysfunction After 35

If you've noticed things aren't working the way they used to in the bedroom, the first thought is usually one of two things: either "I'm getting old" or "I need Viagra." Both of those conclusions are often wrong, or at least incomplete. And jumping to either one without understanding what's actually happening can lead you down a path that's more expensive, more stressful, and less effective than it needs to be. Erectile dysfunction after 35 is more common than most men realise, more nuanced than most marketing suggests, and more connected to overall health than almost anyone talks about. Here's what the research actually says. Misconception 1: ED is an old man's problem This is the most persistent myth, and it stops younger men from seeking help or even acknowledging the issue. The Massachusetts Male Aging Study, one of the largest epidemiological studies on erectile function, found that the combined prevalence of moderate to complete erectile dysfunction was approximately 22% at age 40, rising to 49% by age 70. Even below the age of 40, erectile dysfunction affects an estimated 5 to 10% of men. [1] A 2017 review published in Sexual Medicine Reviews confirmed that ED in men under 40 is an increasingly common condition, with some studies reporting prevalence rates as high as 35% depending on the population studied and the diagnostic criteria used. [2] And a naturalistic study from the University of Florence reported that one in four men seeking medical help for erectile dysfunction was under the age of 40. [3] This isn't a condition that starts at 60. For many men, the first signs appear in their late thirties or early forties, often well before they'd ever consider it a possibility. Misconception 2: It's either physical or psychological The traditional view split ED into two neat categories: organic (physical) or psychogenic (psychological). Young men were assumed to have psychological ED. Older men were assumed to have physical ED. The research tells a different story. A comprehensive Primer published in Nature Reviews Disease Primers describes erectile dysfunction as a multidimensional condition involving an alteration in any of the components of the erectile response, including organic, relational, and psychological factors. [4] In younger men specifically, a review published in Translational Andrology and Urology found that organic, psychological, and relational conditions can all contribute to the development of ED, and that dismissing it as purely psychological in younger men can mean missing underlying cardiovascular or metabolic risk factors. The authors noted that ED in younger men is likely to be overlooked and dismissed without performing any medical assessment, even the most basic ones. [3] The practical reality is that most men past 35 experiencing erectile difficulties have a mix of contributing factors. Stress from work. Poor sleep. Reduced exercise. Weight gain around the middle. Relationship tension. Hormonal shifts. Possibly some early vascular changes. It's rarely one thing, which means a single-mechanism solution (whether that's a pharmaceutical or a supplement) often addresses only part of the problem. Misconception 3: If you have ED, you need medication PDE5 inhibitors like sildenafil (Viagra) and tadalafil (Cialis) are effective, well-studied medications. They work by improving blood flow to the penis during sexual stimulation. For men with significant vascular ED, they can be genuinely life-changing. But here's what doesn't get discussed enough: for many men past 35, particularly those with mild to moderate erectile difficulties driven by lifestyle factors rather than severe vascular disease, medication may not be the most appropriate first step. The StatPearls clinical reference on erectile dysfunction, published through NCBI, states plainly that initial treatment involves improving general health status through lifestyle modifications, and that this approach not only improves erectile function but reduces cardiovascular risk. [5] A 2018 systematic review found that 160 minutes per week of aerobic exercise sustained over six months contributed to a measurable decrease in ED for men with erectile difficulties linked to physical inactivity, obesity, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome. [6] The 2023 meta-analysis of 11 RCTs we cited in a previous article found that regular aerobic exercise produced a mean improvement of 2.8 points on the IIEF-EF scale compared to non-exercising controls. [7] This doesn't mean medication is wrong. It means that for the man whose ED is linked to being stressed, underslept, overweight, and sedentary, a prescription may be treating the symptom while the underlying causes continue unchecked. Misconception 4: ED is just about erections This might be the biggest misconception of all. Erectile dysfunction is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, hypertension, and metabolic syndrome. The Princeton III Consensus Recommendations state that incident erectile dysfunction has a similar, or even greater, predictive value for cardiovascular disease than traditional risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, or smoking. This association is particularly important in men under 55. [4] In other words, ED can be an early warning signal that something is happening in your cardiovascular system. The blood vessels in the penis are smaller than the coronary arteries, so vascular problems often show up there first. A man who treats his ED with medication without investigating the underlying cause may be masking an early indicator of heart disease. This doesn't mean every man with erectile difficulties at 38 has heart disease. But it does mean that ED deserves to be taken seriously as a health signal, not dismissed as a bedroom inconvenience or treated with a pill and forgotten. Misconception 5: A supplement can replace a proper assessment We're a supplement brand, so let's be direct about this. A well-formulated daily supplement can support the biological systems that underpin sexual function: blood flow, hormonal balance, mood, energy, and desire. Ingredients that support nitric oxide production, hormonal health, and daily energy can meaningfully contribute to the broader picture, particularly for men who are already addressing the lifestyle fundamentals. But a supplement is not a diagnostic tool. It can't tell you whether your erectile difficulties are driven by stress, hormonal decline, early vascular changes, medication side effects, or a combination. A GP can. If your erectile function has changed noticeably and persistently, the responsible advice is to get a proper assessment. Check your testosterone. Check your cardiovascular markers. Check your blood pressure and blood sugar. Rule out the things that need ruling out. Then, with that picture clear, decide how you want to support your health going forward, whether that's lifestyle changes, medication, supplementation, or a combination. The brands that tell you their capsule is the only thing you need are doing you a disservice. The honest position is this: a daily formula can be a valuable part of the picture, but it works best when the bigger picture has been properly understood. What this means practically If you're past 35 and noticing changes in your erectile function, here's a practical framework based on what the research supports: Don't ignore it. ED is not a normal part of ageing that you simply accept. It's a signal worth investigating, both for sexual health and for broader cardiovascular health. Get a baseline assessment. Speak to your GP. Get your testosterone checked, your blood pressure measured, your blood sugar tested. This isn't dramatic. It's sensible. Address the fundamentals. Sleep, exercise, stress management, and body composition are the foundation. The evidence for their impact on erectile function is extensive and consistent. Consider daily nutritional support. A formula that supports blood flow, hormonal balance, and energy can complement the fundamentals, particularly over a sustained period of consistent use. Be realistic about timelines. Whether you're making lifestyle changes or starting a daily supplement, improvements in erectile function typically build over weeks and months, not days. The exception is PDE5 inhibitors, which work within hours but address the symptom rather than the underlying cause. References [1] Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, Krane RJ, McKinlay JB. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. Journal of Urology. 1994;151(1):54-61. PMID: 8254833. [2] Nguyen HMT, Gabrielson AT, Hellstrom WJG. Erectile Dysfunction in Young Men: A Review of the Prevalence and Risk Factors. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2017;5(4):508-520. PMID: 28642047. [3] Corona G, Rastrelli G, Filippi S, Vignozzi L, Mannucci E, Maggi M. Erectile dysfunction in fit and healthy young men: psychological or pathological? Translational Andrology and Urology. 2017;6(1):79-90. PMC5313296. [4] Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Boeri L, et al. Erectile dysfunction. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2021. PMC5027992. [5] Leslie SW, Sooriyamoorthy T. Erectile Dysfunction. In: StatPearls. Updated January 2024. NCBI Bookshelf NBK562253. [6] Gerbild H, Larsen CM, Graugaard C, Areskoug Josefsson K. Physical Activity to Improve Erectile Function: A Systematic Review of Intervention Studies. Sexual Medicine. 2018;6(2):75-89. PMC5960035. [7] Khera M, Bhattacharyya S, Miller LE. Effect of aerobic exercise on erectile function: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2023;20(12):1369-1375. PMID: 37814532. Talon supports blood flow, hormonal balance, energy, and desire as part of a daily system. It's not a replacement for a proper assessment. It's what comes after, for men who want to support the full picture alongside the fundamentals. 11 active ingredients. Full doses listed. 90-day guarantee. 
Why Your Libido Isn't Just About Libido

Journal

Why Your Libido Isn't Just About Libido

If your sex drive has gone quiet, the instinct is to treat it as a sex problem. Find a pill. Fix the symptom. Move on. But here's what most men don't realise until they start digging: libido isn't a standalone system. It's a downstream signal. It's your body telling you something broader is off. And until you understand what's actually feeding into it, targeting libido in isolation is like turning up the volume on a speaker that's not plugged in. Libido is a multi-system output Sexual desire in men is regulated by a combination of hormonal, neurological, vascular, and psychological factors. It's not one switch. It's several systems working together, and when one starts to underperform, the others tend to follow. Research published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine in 2025 found bidirectional associations between daily stress and sexual desire in healthy adults. Men and women who reported higher subjective stress also reported lower concurrent sexual desire and arousal. [1] A separate study published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine found that daily stressors predicted lower sexual satisfaction in men, with the effects mediated through depression scores. Financial stress, work pressure, and general life load were all correlated with diminished sexual function. [2] And a 2025 ambulatory assessment study that tracked stress and sexuality across 14 consecutive days found that higher subjective stress was associated with lower concurrent sexual desire and arousal, while previous sexual activity was associated with lower subsequent cortisol levels. [3] In plain language: stress lowers desire, and desire lowers when stress is high. But it also works the other way. When you do feel desire and act on it, your stress hormones actually drop. The systems are connected. The sleep connection Sleep is one of the most underrated factors in male sexual function. Most testosterone production occurs during deep sleep phases. When sleep is restricted, disrupted, or consistently poor, testosterone output drops. Research has shown that even one week of restricted sleep (five hours per night) can reduce daytime testosterone levels by 10 to 15% in young healthy men. [4] But it's not just about testosterone. Poor sleep affects dopamine receptor sensitivity, cardiovascular function, cortisol regulation, and mood. All of which feed directly into libido. A man who's sleeping badly isn't just tired. His body is running the hormonal equivalent of a reduced service. Sleep apnoea compounds this further. Men with obstructive sleep apnoea are significantly more likely to experience erectile dysfunction, and treating the apnoea often improves sexual function without any other intervention. [5] The exercise effect Physical activity is one of the most consistently supported interventions for male sexual function in the clinical literature. A 2024 systematic review published in PubMed, covering 15 studies, concluded that physical exercise is highly associated with better sexual function in men across multiple populations, including men without comorbidities and men with diabetes or cardiovascular disease. The researchers noted that exercise influences nitric oxide production, improves vascular function, supports arterial health, and maintains male erection. [6] A separate 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 randomised controlled trials found that men participating in regular aerobic exercise reported improved erectile function compared to non-exercising controls, with a mean improvement of 2.8 points on the IIEF-EF scale. The benefit was greatest in men with lower baseline scores. [7] The recommended dose, if you can call it that: 40 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic exercise, four times per week. That's 160 minutes per week sustained over six months. Not extreme. Not bodybuilder territory. Just consistent movement. However, there's an important caveat. A study published in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise found that excessive high-intensity endurance training was associated with decreased libido scores in men. The men with the lowest and mid-range training intensities had significantly greater odds of maintaining a healthy libido than those training at the highest intensities. [8] The takeaway: moderate, consistent exercise supports libido. Extreme overtraining can suppress it. Balance matters. The stress and cortisol loop Chronic stress elevates cortisol. Cortisol competes with testosterone for the same biochemical building blocks. When stress is sustained over weeks and months, the body prioritises cortisol production at the expense of testosterone, and libido drops as a consequence. The 2013 Tongkat Ali study we covered in a previous article demonstrated this relationship clearly. Moderately stressed subjects who received supplementation showed a 16% reduction in cortisol alongside a 37% increase in salivary testosterone over four weeks. The mood improvements, including reduced tension, anger, and confusion, tracked alongside the hormonal changes. [9] This isn't just a hormonal problem. Chronic stress also affects the brain's limbic system, which controls sexual desire and arousal. Elevated cortisol disrupts dopamine and serotonin pathways, reducing motivation, pleasure, and the neurological drive behind desire. A man under sustained stress may not just lack the hormonal fuel for libido. He may lack the psychological motivation for it too. The relationship dimension There's a factor that rarely appears in supplement marketing but shows up consistently in the clinical literature: relationship quality. Unresolved conflict, emotional distance, poor communication, and partner dissatisfaction all contribute to reduced sexual desire. This isn't a moral judgement. It's biology. Emotional safety and connection are part of the neurological infrastructure that supports desire. For many men past 35, the libido decline they're experiencing isn't happening in isolation. It's happening alongside increased work pressure, disrupted sleep, reduced exercise, mounting stress, and sometimes, relationship strain. All of these feed into the same system. What this actually means Libido isn't a single problem with a single fix. It's the visible symptom of how well several connected systems are functioning together: hormones, sleep, stress, physical activity, mood, and relationship health. A product that targets only one of these pathways (just testosterone, or just blood flow, or just mood) is addressing one input while ignoring the others. That's why most single-mechanism supplements feel underwhelming. They're solving a fraction of a multi-system problem. The most effective approach is one that supports as many of these systems as possible simultaneously. That means lifestyle fundamentals (sleep, exercise, stress management) combined with nutritional support that works across the hormonal, circulatory, and neurological pathways that feed into desire. That's the thinking behind a full-picture formula. Not a libido pill. Not a testosterone booster. A daily system that supports the interconnected biology of energy, drive, confidence, and desire together, because that's how your body actually works. References [1] Schrimpf M, Gerger H, Gall M, et al. Bidirectional associations between daily subjective stress and sexual desire, arousal, and activity in healthy men and women. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2025;59(1):kaaf007. PMID: 40036286. [2] Hamilton LD, Meston CM. The relationship between daily hassles and sexual function in men and women. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2013;10(12):2904-2914. PMID: 24313631. [3] Schrimpf M, Kämmerer A, Engler H, Gall M, et al. Too stressed for sex? Associations between stress and sex in daily life. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2025. PMID: 40907147. [4] Leproult R, Van Cauter E. Effect of 1 week of sleep restriction on testosterone levels in young healthy men. JAMA. 2011;305(21):2173-2174. [5] Budweiser S, et al. Sleep apnea is an independent correlate of erectile and sexual dysfunction. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2009;6(11):3147-3157. [6] Rodrigues FCP, et al. Influence of physical activity practice on sexual function in men: a systematic review. Sexual Medicine. 2025. PMID: 40009218. [7] Khera M, Bhattacharyya S, Miller LE. Effect of aerobic exercise on erectile function: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2023;20(12):1369-1375. PMID: 37814532. [8] Hackney AC, Lane AR, Register-Mihalik J, O'Leary CB. Endurance exercise training and male sexual libido. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2017;49(7):1383-1388. PMID: 28195945. [9] Talbott SM, Talbott JA, George A, Pugh M. Effect of Tongkat Ali on stress hormones and psychological mood state in moderately stressed subjects. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2013;10:28. PMC3669033. Talon was designed around this thinking. One formula that supports hormonal balance, blood flow, mood, and energy as a connected system, because libido doesn't work in isolation. 11 active ingredients. Full doses listed.
Tongkat Ali: What the Research Actually Says

Journal

Tongkat Ali: What the Research Actually Says

Tongkat Ali is one of the most searched, most debated, and most misunderstood ingredients in the men's supplement space. Depending on where you read about it, it's either a natural testosterone miracle or an overhyped herb that does nothing. The truth, as it usually does, sits somewhere in the middle. And if you're considering a supplement that contains Tongkat Ali, you deserve to see the research rather than the marketing. Here's what the clinical evidence actually shows. What Tongkat Ali is Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia) is a plant native to Southeast Asia, primarily Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand. Its root has been used in traditional medicine for centuries, historically for fevers, infections, and as a general tonic. In recent decades, it's become one of the most popular ingredients in men's health supplements, primarily marketed for testosterone support, libido, and energy. It goes by several names. Longjack. Malaysian Ginseng. Pasak Bumi. If you've browsed the men's supplement aisle, you've almost certainly seen it. The testosterone evidence The most discussed claim about Tongkat Ali is that it raises testosterone levels. And there is evidence to support this, but with important caveats. A 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis published in Medicina, which analysed five randomised controlled trials, found a significant improvement in total testosterone levels in men supplemented with Eurycoma longifolia. The effect was observed in both healthy volunteers and men with clinically low testosterone. [1] A separate 2013 study published in the Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition found that 200mg per day of standardised Tongkat Ali extract for four weeks produced a 37% increase in salivary testosterone alongside a 16% decrease in cortisol in moderately stressed subjects. [2] And a 2021 six-month randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial found that Tongkat Ali increased testosterone levels in approximately 50% of study participants and significantly improved erectile function scores, particularly when combined with concurrent exercise training. [3] These are real findings from published, peer-reviewed research. They're worth taking seriously. But here's the nuance the marketing usually leaves out. What the marketing doesn't tell you The studies are small. The 2022 meta-analysis pooled only five RCTs. The 2013 cortisol study had 63 participants. The 2021 trial had 45. These are promising results, but they're not the kind of large-scale, replicated evidence base that would support the absolute claims many brands make. An earlier meta-analysis from 2015, published in Complementary Therapies in Medicine, looked specifically at Tongkat Ali's effect on erectile function. It found only two relevant studies totalling 139 participants, and the pooled result showed no significant between-group difference at 12 weeks. A subgroup of men with lower baseline scores did show improvement, but the authors concluded that more trials were needed. [4] The doses used in the positive studies (typically 200mg to 400mg of standardised extract) don't always match what's in commercial supplements. Many products include Tongkat Ali at lower doses or use non-standardised extracts, which makes it difficult to extrapolate results from clinical research to what you're actually swallowing. And the quality of the extract matters enormously. Standardised hot-water extracts used in clinical trials are not the same as the generic Tongkat Ali powder you might find in a cheap Amazon blend. The side effects conversation Tongkat Ali is generally well tolerated in clinical studies at standard doses (200mg to 400mg daily). But the conversation online, particularly on Reddit and supplement forums, tells a messier story. Commonly reported side effects include insomnia, restlessness, irritability, and anxiety. These appear to be more frequent at higher doses (above 400mg) and in individuals who are sensitive to stimulant-like effects. Tongkat Ali contains alkaloids that may trigger these reactions in some people. [5] A 2021 report by the European Food Safety Authority flagged that high doses (2,000mg per kilogram of body weight) of water-based Tongkat Ali extract may lead to DNA damage in stomach and duodenal tissue. The panel concluded that the safety of the ingredient at any condition of use had not been fully established. [5] This is at doses far beyond what any supplement provides, but it's worth knowing the regulatory picture isn't entirely settled. The practical takeaway: at 80mg to 200mg daily as part of a broader formula, the side effect profile appears to be mild and manageable for most men. But if you're someone who reacts strongly to caffeine, stimulants, or adaptogens, Tongkat Ali is worth introducing gradually rather than starting at a high dose. What this means for choosing a supplement If you're evaluating a supplement that contains Tongkat Ali, here's what to look for based on what the research actually supports: Dose matters. The positive studies used 200mg to 400mg of standardised extract. If a product lists Tongkat Ali without telling you the dose, you have no way of knowing whether you're getting a clinically relevant amount or a trace. Standardisation matters. Look for standardised hot-water root extracts rather than generic powder. The clinical results come from specific extraction methods, not from ground root in a capsule. Context matters. The strongest results in the research come from Tongkat Ali used alongside exercise and as part of a daily routine over weeks and months, not as a one-off dose. The 2021 trial that showed the best results combined Tongkat Ali with concurrent training over six months. Honesty matters. Any brand that tells you Tongkat Ali will "boost your testosterone by 300%" or "work like natural Viagra" is extrapolating well beyond what the published evidence supports. The research is promising but not conclusive. A good brand will tell you that. References [1] Leisegang K, Finelli R, Engel KM, et al. Eurycoma longifolia (Jack) Improves Serum Total Testosterone in Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials. Medicina. 2022;58(8):1047. PMC9415500. [2] Talbott SM, Talbott JA, George A, Pugh M. Effect of Tongkat Ali on stress hormones and psychological mood state in moderately stressed subjects. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2013;10:28. PMC3669033. [3] Leitão AE, de Souza Vieira MC, Pelegrini A, da Silva EL, de Azevedo Guimarães AC. A 6-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to evaluate the effect of Eurycoma longifolia (Tongkat Ali) and concurrent training on erectile function and testosterone levels in androgen deficiency of aging males (ADAM). Maturitas. 2021;145:78-85. PMID: 33541567. [4] Kotirum S, Ismail SB, Chaiyakunapruk N. Efficacy of Tongkat Ali (Eurycoma longifolia) on erectile function improvement: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2015;23(5):693-698. PMID: 26365449. [5] European Food Safety Authority Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens. Safety of Eurycoma longifolia (Tongkat Ali) root extract as a novel food. EFSA Journal. 2021;19(12):6937. Talon includes Tongkat Ali at 80mg per daily serving as part of an 11-ingredient formula. We chose this dose because it performed consistently in our testing without the side effects reported at higher levels. Full doses listed on the bottle.
What Actually Happens to Men's Energy After 35

Journal

What Actually Happens to Men's Energy After 35

There's a specific moment most men can't quite pinpoint. Somewhere in your mid-to-late thirties, the energy shifts. Not dramatically. Not in a way that sends you to the GP. Just enough that you notice the difference between how you feel now and how you remember feeling five or ten years ago. The alarm goes off and you're not ready for it like you used to be. The afternoon slump hits harder and earlier. The things you used to do without thinking, the gym after work, staying sharp in a late meeting, being present in the evening instead of zoning out on the sofa, now cost more effort than they should. Most men put this down to age, stress, or being busy. And those things are real contributors. But there's also something physiological happening that most men don't fully understand, and that the supplement industry wildly oversimplifies. The hormonal shift is real, but it's not what the adverts tell you The most discussed change in men after 35 is the decline in testosterone. And it is real. Research published in PMC on age-related testosterone decline found that in men over 35, aging leads to changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis, primarily showing as decreased GnRH secretion and reduced responsiveness to LH stimulation. [1] Longitudinal studies have consistently shown a gradual decline in serum testosterone levels from around the age of 30 to 40, continuing progressively with age. Free testosterone, the portion your body can actually use, declines at roughly 2 to 3% per year from the age of 40 onwards. [2] But here's what the "testosterone booster" marketing won't tell you: the decline is gradual, highly variable between individuals, and heavily influenced by factors that have nothing to do with your hormones directly. A comprehensive review published in Endotext, the NCBI's clinical endocrinology textbook, put it plainly: the rate of age-related decline in testosterone is affected by chronic illness, body fat, medication, sleep, sampling time, and even how the measurement is taken. [3] In other words, two men of the same age can have wildly different testosterone levels depending on how they sleep, how much visceral fat they carry, how stressed they are, and what medication they take. The decline is not a single-speed conveyor belt towards low testosterone. It's a complex interaction between your hormones, your lifestyle, and your overall health. It's not just testosterone What most men experience after 35 isn't just a testosterone problem. It's a multi-system slowdown. The same NCBI Endotext review documented that age-related hormonal changes in men include not just testosterone decline, but also changes in DHEA (a precursor hormone), alterations in growth hormone and IGF-1 output, shifts in cortisol regulation, and changes in how the body processes insulin. [3] Research published in the American Journal of Psychiatry listed the clinical manifestations of testosterone decline as including reduced energy, diminished libido, weakness, poor memory, reduced muscle mass, insomnia, irritability, anxiety, and depressed mood. The authors noted these symptoms exhibit considerable overlap with primary psychiatric disorders and that comprehensive assessment should be routine rather than attributing everything to hormones. [4] That's an important point. What men experience as "low energy" or "feeling flat" is rarely caused by a single hormonal number. It's the combined effect of hormonal shifts, changes in sleep quality, increased stress load, reduced physical activity, and the cumulative wear of adult responsibilities. Energy, mood, drive, confidence, and sexual function are all connected through the same physiological systems. When one starts to decline, the others tend to follow. The muscle and metabolism connection There's a physical dimension to this that compounds the problem. Research documented in the NCBI Endotext review showed that between the ages of 20 and 80, men lose approximately 35 to 40% of their skeletal muscle mass. The loss is disproportionately concentrated in type II muscle fibres, the ones responsible for power and explosive movement. At the same time, body fat tends to increase, particularly around the midsection, even when diet and activity levels remain unchanged. [3] This creates what clinicians describe as a vicious cycle. Lower energy leads to less exercise. Less exercise leads to further muscle loss and fat gain. Increased fat tissue, particularly visceral fat, actively contributes to lower testosterone production. Which leads to even lower energy. And so on. Breaking this cycle typically requires addressing multiple factors simultaneously rather than targeting one hormone with a single supplement. What actually helps The clinical evidence points to a handful of things that genuinely support men's energy and hormonal health after 35. None of them are dramatic, and none of them work in isolation. Sleep. Testosterone production is closely tied to sleep quality. Most testosterone is produced during deep sleep phases. Poor sleep, disrupted sleep, or insufficient sleep directly reduces testosterone output. Several studies have shown that even a week of restricted sleep (five hours per night) can reduce daytime testosterone levels by 10 to 15% in young healthy men. [5] Resistance training. Regular strength training is one of the most consistently supported interventions for maintaining muscle mass, improving hormonal output, and sustaining energy levels in men over 35. The evidence for this is extensive and largely uncontested in the clinical literature. Body composition. Reducing visceral fat has a direct positive effect on testosterone levels. Research consistently shows that overweight and obese men have lower testosterone than men of healthy weight, and that weight loss is associated with increases in serum testosterone. Stress management. Chronic stress elevates cortisol, which has an inverse relationship with testosterone. High cortisol environments suppress testosterone production over time. Nutritional support. Certain nutrient deficiencies, particularly zinc, vitamin D, and magnesium, are associated with lower testosterone levels. Correcting genuine deficiencies can support hormonal health as part of a broader approach. Where supplements fit in The honest answer is: supplements are one tool among several, and they work best as part of the bigger picture. No capsule replaces good sleep, regular exercise, and managed stress. The brands that promise otherwise are selling you a shortcut that doesn't exist. The best supplements work alongside the fundamentals, not instead of them. Where a well-formulated daily supplement genuinely helps is in supporting the biological systems that underpin energy, drive, and hormonal balance, particularly for men who are already doing the basics but still feeling the gap. Ingredients that support blood flow, hormonal balance, mood, and daily energy can meaningfully contribute when they're part of a disciplined formula taken consistently over time. The key word is "support." A serious formula supports what your body is already trying to do. It fills the gaps, strengthens the foundation, and gives your system more to work with. That's a realistic and honest role for a supplement to play, and it's exactly the role Talon was designed to fill. References [1] Zhang J, Li X, Cai Z, Li H, Yang B. Age-related testosterone decline: mechanisms and intervention strategies. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2024. PMC11562514. [2] Kratzik CW, Reiter WJ, Gerstner GJ, et al. The rate of change in declining steroid hormones: a new parameter of healthy aging in men? Oncotarget. 2017;8(13):21694-21702. PMC5308620. [3] Bhasin S, Jasuja R. Age-Related Changes in the Male Reproductive System. In: Endotext. Updated February 2022. NCBI Bookshelf NBK278998. [4] Seidman SN, Walsh BT. Testosterone and depression in aging men. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;156(10):1310-1318. PMID: 9766760. [5] Leproult R, Van Cauter E. Effect of 1 week of sleep restriction on testosterone levels in young healthy men. JAMA. 2011;305(21):2173-2174. Talon was built for men who are already doing the work but still feeling the gap. 11 active ingredients. Full doses listed. 90-day guarantee. 
Why Most Men's Supplements Don't Work

Journal

Why Most Men's Supplements Don't Work

You've probably tried at least one. Maybe a testosterone booster from Amazon. Maybe a libido formula from a brand you found through an Instagram ad. Maybe something a mate recommended. And if you're reading this, it probably didn't work. Or it worked for a fortnight and stopped. Or you couldn't tell whether it was doing anything at all. You're not alone. And it's not your fault. The men's supplement category has a structural problem, and until you understand what that problem is, every product on the shelf is going to feel like a gamble. Here's what's actually going on. The evidence gap is bigger than most brands will admit In 2020, researchers at Thomas Jefferson University published a systematic review in the International Journal of Impotence Research that looked at the ingredients in the top-selling testosterone and erectile dysfunction supplements in the United States. They reviewed 37 ingredients across 32 products and searched for randomised controlled trials supporting their use. The findings were sobering. No whole supplement product had published randomised controlled trial evidence. Only 19% of individual ingredients received strong positive evidence. And 68% of ingredients received grades for contradictory, negative, or lacking evidence. [1] A separate study published in the World Journal of Men's Health evaluated 50 testosterone booster supplements found via Google search. Ninety percent claimed to boost testosterone. But when the researchers checked PubMed, only 24.8% of the individual components had any data showing an increase in testosterone. 10.1% actually had data suggesting they decreased it. And for 61.5% of the components, no data existed at all. [2] That's the category you're shopping in. Most products are built from ingredients where the evidence is either mixed, missing, or pointing in the wrong direction. The proprietary blend problem Even when a supplement contains ingredients with some supporting evidence, there's another problem: you often can't tell how much of each ingredient you're actually getting. A proprietary blend is a labelling practice that allows supplement manufacturers to list a group of ingredients under a single name with only the total weight disclosed. The individual doses of each ingredient are hidden. This is legal in most markets, including the UK. According to research published in the journal Nutrients, approximately 34% of supplement labels in the US Dietary Supplement Label Database listed ingredients in blends, and 21% used proprietary blends specifically. The study noted that this practice "complicates the quantification of bioactives listed as dietary ingredients for accurately estimating exposures." [3] In plain language: you can't tell what you're taking. A supplement might list 15 impressive-sounding ingredients on the label with a total proprietary blend weight of 500mg. Do the maths. That's an average of roughly 33mg per ingredient, and in reality the first ingredient probably takes up most of the weight while the rest are present in trace amounts. The supplement industry calls this "fairy dusting" or "label dressing." It means including just enough of an ingredient to print its name on the label, without including enough to actually do anything. The fake review problem The research also points to something uncomfortable about the reviews you see online. A 2019 study published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine analysed the top-selling testosterone boosters on Amazon. When they ran the customer reviews through ReviewMeta (a tool that identifies potentially unreliable reviews), the results changed dramatically. There was a 91% decrease in users reporting increased libido after filtering. A 59% decrease in reports of increased energy. And a 93% decrease in reports of improved strength and endurance. [4] That doesn't mean every positive review is fake. But it means the review landscape is heavily distorted, and the confidence you get from seeing "4.5 stars, 3,000 reviews" might not reflect real-world experience as accurately as it appears. Why the category stays broken The supplement industry is largely self-regulated. Unlike pharmaceuticals, supplements don't require pre-market approval. They don't need to demonstrate efficacy through clinical trials before being sold. The burden of proof is on regulators to show a product is unsafe, not on manufacturers to show it works. This creates a market where the barrier to entry is low, the incentive to differentiate on formulation is weak, and the easiest way to compete is on marketing rather than performance. More aggressive claims. Better packaging. Louder branding. Bigger ingredient lists. None of which have anything to do with whether the product actually works in your body. So what should you actually look for? If you're still open to trying a men's supplement after reading this, here's what the research suggests you should check before buying: Full dose disclosure. If a product uses a proprietary blend, you can't verify whether the ingredients are dosed at levels that match the existing research. Look for products that list every ingredient with its individual dose per serving. Fewer, more intentional ingredients. A long ingredient list is not a sign of quality. In many cases, it's a sign of label dressing. A formula with 8 to 12 well-chosen ingredients at meaningful doses is generally more credible than a formula with 25 ingredients at unmeasured amounts. Manufacturing certifications. GMP certification, third-party testing, and food safety certifications (like BRCGS) don't guarantee the product will work, but they do confirm the product contains what the label says it contains. That's a minimum standard many products fail to meet. Realistic timelines. Any product that promises noticeable results within days is either pharmaceutical-grade (and should be regulated as such) or overpromising. Botanical formulas work on a timeline of weeks, not hours. If the marketing doesn't acknowledge that, the brand is prioritising the sale over your experience. A brand that acknowledges the problem. The best signal of a trustworthy supplement brand is one that openly discusses why the category has a trust problem. If a brand talks as though the entire market is working perfectly and they're simply the best version of it, they're part of the problem. References [1] Kuchakulla M, Narasimman M, Soni Y, Zielinski M, Randazzo M, Ramasamy R. A systematic review and evidence-based analysis of ingredients in popular male testosterone and erectile dysfunction supplements. International Journal of Impotence Research. 2021;33:311-317. doi:10.1038/s41443-020-0285-x [2] Clemesha CG, Thaker H, Samplaski MK. 'Testosterone Boosting' Supplements Composition and Claims Are not Supported by the Academic Literature. World Journal of Men's Health. 2020;38(1):115-122. doi:10.5534/wjmh.190043 [3] Saldanha LG, Dwyer JT, Andrews KW, Bailey RL. Perspectives on the Use of Proprietary Blends in Dietary Supplements. Nutrients. 2023;15(10):2340. doi:10.3390/nu15102340 [4] Balasubramanian A, Thirumavalavan N, Srivatsav A, Yu J, Lipshultz LI, Pastuszak AW. Testosterone Imposters: An Analysis of Popular Online Testosterone Boosting Supplements. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2019;16(2):203-212. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.12.008 Talon was built with this problem in mind. Full doses listed. No proprietary blends. 25+ formulations tested before launch.